Total Pageviews

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Unit 1 Review

Rope-Stretchers of the World - UNITE!!

(you know the drill)

GO ahead... impress me with questions AND answers... I dare ya!!

39 comments:

  1. For the test, will we have to know formulas such as the midpoint formula and distance formula? :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. For #4 on the Chapter Test, I can only find 3 coplanar points? EBD

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wouldn't the answer to all the letters on #6 be 1? Or this that just a trick question?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm still confused on the coordinate grid perimeter and area problems, like #10 on the Chapter Test. What formula do you use to find the length? Help!!

    ~CONFUZZLED

    ReplyDelete
  5. For #20 on the Chapter Test, I would say sometimes, but when naming a ray, do you always have to start with the endpoint? i.e. If the endpoint was Q, would it always have to be rayQE or rayQW?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just looked at the video tutors and found a "Finding Perimeter in the coordinate plane".. I'll watch that and see if it helps!

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are overly concerned about these formulas:

    The distance formula is merely an alternate/equivalent view of the Pythagorean Theorem.

    The midpoint formula is merely averaging the coordinate values of x & y.

    LOOK AT A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES AND THINK ABOUT IT!

    (x1+x2)/2 is simply averaging the x values.(y1+y2)/2 is simply averaging the y values.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You are correct with your answer to #6... the answer to #4 is hidden in your answer to #6, I'll let you struggle with that one for awhile!

    ReplyDelete
  9. OOOOOOOH...

    And will we have to know the definitions of all the postulates?

    I just came back from a game of Geopardy!! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yup, u gotsk to know the postulates... but memorize the definitions word for word??... that doesn't sound like me.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Look at the definition of rays & opposite rays on page 12. Opposite rays must be named with the SAME endppoint (interestingly, the "endpoint" is the first point listed when naming a ray... fascinating, eh?).

    In #20, are ray-LJ and ray-TJ named with the SAME ENDPOINT?

    ReplyDelete
  12. And I still don't know #4..

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm still gonna let you struggle with #4... look at some of your answers to #6... be careful, when the plane spins it might knock you off your chair!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Okay... Uh oh!

    And I'm not sure about #24 either.. Just to have some variety, I guess?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Am I off on #25? Because for the amount of carpet they have I got 90 ft^2, and for the amount they need I got 300n ft^2.. Am I doing something wrong? :O

    ReplyDelete
  16. It is said that there are no stupid questions, but #24 comes really close in my opinion. Your answer is good enough for me.

    #25 huh? Double check your units... how many feet in a yard? How many square feet in a square yard?

    ReplyDelete
  17. What would be considered a hidden edge? For an orthographic drawing?

    ReplyDelete
  18. For the test, would you ask something like "Name Postulate 6." or "What is the name of Postulate 11?"

    ReplyDelete
  19. For #14 on pg 72, how would I figure that out..? I couldn't make them equal eachother because they are 2 different midpoints..????? What do I do, please help!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Would linear pair and supplementary angles be the same?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Will we have calculators to use on the test, to find the square to of numbers, for example?

    ReplyDelete
  22. What would the answer to #33 on pg 74 be? For the first part, (x1+x2)/2, I got 0/2! Would the answer be undefined?

    ReplyDelete
  23. I have no interest in naming postulates or theorems by number, although some of your brains might work better by memorizing things that way. I have little use for memorization unless it assists you in UNDERSTANDING the concepts. So, I won't fight memorization, but I certainly won't demand things like numbering postulates.

    ReplyDelete
  24. A linear pair requires that two adjacent angles form a straight line. Supplementary angles are two angles that sum to 180 degrees. You tell me... is that the SAME THING? Why or why not?

    ReplyDelete
  25. And for the linear pair..

    Yes.. I think..? Because lines are always 180 degrees.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Speaking of calculators, try inputting 0/2 and 2/0... what do you get back?

    Does that answer your question?

    ReplyDelete
  27. If you need to find square roots to the nearest tenth, for example, you will have a calculator to assist you.

    ReplyDelete
  28. For 0/2, I get 0..

    And for 2/0, I get "Error". So I guess #/0 is undefined?

    ReplyDelete
  29. And for the calculator, ok!

    ReplyDelete
  30. I think you are misreading the diagram on pg 72 #14. 3m+5 is the length of seg-AB. 4m-10 is the length of seg-BC. The red bar on each segment indicates that the segments are congruent. I think you are reading the red bars as if they are midpoints. The congruent segments simply infer that Point B is the midpoint of seg-AC.

    Ca-peesh?

    ReplyDelete
  31. For two angles to physically form a line, they must be adjacent and sum to 180 degrees. If they meet both criteria, they are considered to be a linear pair.

    IF two angles sum to 180 degrees, they are supplementary, whether or not they are adjacent. If they are not adjacent, then they do NOT form a linear pair.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Ohhhhh! Now I gotsk it! Ca-peesh!

    ReplyDelete
  33. & for the angles thingie: Okay.. I'll try to remember.. But I get it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. In an orthographic drawing, you could "hide" a cube or two behind a wall of cubes if you so desired. This would be very mean to do on a geometry test, so the text book and I will refrain from doing so. I reserve the right to be mean at other times as I deem appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Thanks for the help, Mr.C!!

    ReplyDelete
  36. For number four in the chapter 1 review, I can only find three coplanar points, unless all points that lie on line ABC are coplanar?

    ReplyDelete